[Editor's note: The Associated Press again uses incorrect terminology when reporting on this story. When using the phrase "assistant U.S. Army chaplain," the AP is referring to a chaplain assistant.]
By Admin 29 January 2012. Filed in Chaplain Assistants, Ethics.
0[Editor's note: The Associated Press again uses incorrect terminology when reporting on this story. When using the phrase "assistant U.S. Army chaplain," the AP is referring to a chaplain assistant.]
By Admin 18 January 2012. Filed in Ethics, News & Commentary.
0
Instead, last week, Jackson became the latest soldier to be convicted of sexually exploiting a child. Over a seven-month period Jackson, 46, a married father of two, used the Internet to send hundreds of obscenity-laced texts and about seven hours of graphic video of himself to what prosecutors said he believed to be a 14-year-old girl. In reality, it was a St. Charles County Sheriff’s detective.
A Pentagon spokesman said problems with child pornography and child sexual exploitation were not widespread in the ranks. Still, the military has taken steps to address the issue, including offering training and blocking access from government computers to some sites.
By Admin 3 September 2011. Filed in Ethics, News & Commentary.
1By Admin 4 April 2011. Filed in Ethics, News & Commentary.
0
Did a chaplain’s fake Purple Heart erase good deeds? – CSMonitor.comhttp://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2011/0403/Did-a-chaplain-s-fake-Purple-Heart-erase-good-deedsAs he turned in his discharge papers in 1991 after four years in the Army’s 82nd Airborne, 22-year-old Specialist Kurt Bishop decided he was going to change his life. Growing up, he had always hovered at the periphery of groups – not quite an outcast, but never at the center. His father was a retired fighter pilot; his brother flew helicopters for the National Guard, and though they never showed him anything but love, he was well aware that even during his nine-month deployment during Desert Storm, he had worked at a desk, not in a cockpit. He was the guy infantry soldiers teasingly call a POG – Position Other than Grunt.
So on that afternoon in 1991, he walked into a uniform store and bought four ribbons – color-coded insignia that signify military honors and medals. Mr. Bishop knew that a chestful of decorations made people go, “Wow!”
The ones he bought included a Purple Heart, awarded to those wounded or killed serving the country, and a Bronze Star with a ‘V’ that recognizes heroism in combat. Nobody asked any questions – the sale and purchase of decorations is not illegal or monitored. He also bought seven badges that denoted advanced military training – including a Rangers patch, which marks the wearer as one of the Army’s elite.
By Admin 26 March 2011. Filed in Ethics, News & Commentary.
2
Meeting with reporters outside the Downtown headquarters of the Archdiocese of Baltimore, Members of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests called for congressional hearings to determine “how frequently and why Catholic officials dumped predator priests on military bases.”
And they distributed documents that they said showed that Archbishop Edwin F. O’Brien ignored sexual misconduct by chaplains when he headed the U.S. Archdiocese for the Military Services.
O’Brien’s spokesman called the allegations absurd, groundless and unsupported.
“Archbishop O’Brien is deeply committed to protecting youth in the care of the Church,” spokesman Sean Caine said in a lengthy statement e-mailed to The Baltimore Sun in response to the group’s allegations.
By Admin 24 March 2011. Filed in Chaplain Assistants, Ethics.
0By Admin 1 May 2010. Filed in Ethics.
0PHOENIX — A Queen Creek man has been indicted by a federal grand jury for making false claims about medals, awards and training he received during his military career.
Kurt Alan Bishop, 42, claimed he was awarded the Bronze Star with Valor, Purple Heart and that he received training to become an Army Ranger, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
The indictment alleges that Bishop, an army chaplain, began making false claims in 1991 shortly after he ended his first tour of duty.
Editor’s Note: The article linked above is not longer available. However, an additional article is available from Military.com
By Daniel J. Sparks 28 January 2010. Filed in Ethics.
7Our military faces the threat of compromised security, increased friction in personal and professional relationships, and poor discipline. This threat looms not from the figure of an enemy in a foreign nation, but its shadow is cast by some of our country’s own citizens. This threat comes from the possible legal authorization and permissiveness of homosexual activity within the ranks. Some within our nation would prefer to accommodate the immoral and indecent actions of a few to the detriment of our servicemembers and the safety of our citizenry.
Homosexual conduct contradicts the laws of nature and of nature’s God. It, like other aberrant forms of sexuality, condones unbridled passions that lead to mistrust, failed relationships, the spread of disease, lack of discipline, and other irresponsible personal behavior. Men can only thrive under liberty ordered by moral law. The moral law of Western civilization clearly tells us that sexual immorality is offensive to God, to our fellow man, and repugnant to the survival of our culture.
Before we lay aside the longstanding laws and policies of our nation, we should take a long, hard look at the reasons that such laws and policies were codified. Every culture known to man has affirmed the intrinsic value of sex within heterosexual marriage. In fact, history has proven, time and again, that a society that approves of immorality and sexual permissiveness is doomed to failure—perhaps slow and treacherous failure, but failure to be sure.
At this moment, leaders in the White House, the United States Congress, and the military are considering repealing the law that prohibits homosexual conduct in our military. We face one of the most critical decisions affecting the good order and discipline of our nation’s military and its military readiness. Will our elected and appointed officials make the right decision? I encourage all citizens of the United States to contact their Congressional representatives and other government leaders about this matter. We cannot afford to have a military in which discipline and national security are compromised by authorized homosexual activity.
[The views expressed herein are my own and are not those of the Department of Defense.]
By Admin 6 October 2009. Filed in Ethics.
0By Pastor Bob Leroe/Cliftondale Congregational Church
Just-War Theory is a checklist of criteria used to determine if a particular war/conflict is morally acceptable. The presupposition is that some wars may be justifiable, in contrast to the pacifist claim that all wars are morally wrong.
Those who choose military service are faced with the question of whether it is permissible to bear arms. Not all wars are equal, and obviously not all world religions agree about the matter of war. Military ethicists have compiled the following list to help people decide.
1. Just Cause: Having right on one’s side. Honorable motives, protection of oppressed, self-defense, concern for the dignity and worth of human life, compassion for one’s neighbor.
READ MORE from Saugus Advertiser